USPTO serial 87015636
CLEAR FLIGHT SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2018
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEAR FLIGHT SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond M. Mehler
200 WEST ADAMS STREETSUITE 2850CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Remote controlled flying vehicles, drones and unmanned air craft systems for bird control purposes in the field of agriculture, waste management, airports and harbors; remote controlled flying vehicles and drones to be used for inspections of nature and wildlife at industrial areas, construction sites, agricultural and horticultural areas, harbors and airports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Bird control services, other than for agricultural or horticultural purposes; Animal removal services, namely, the removal of the presence of birds, other than for agricultural or horticultural purposes; Inspection services in the course of construction of agricultural or horticultural structures, harbors and airports by means of remote controlled flying objects and drones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and ecological research in the fields of bird control and control of wildlife, respectively, bird and wildlife protection; Scientific research services in the field of natural science studies concerning birds and wildlife | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Bird control services for agricultural and horticultural purposes; Consultation services in the field of agriculture, horticulture and forestry for both bird control and bird protection featuring the gathering of information and data; Agricultural consultancy services concerning the use of drones for agricultural purposes; Information services featuring the compilation and provision of data relating to bird removal and control; Bird control services for agricultural and horticultural purposes featuring aerial field and forest inspections | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CFS GreenX Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CFS GreenX Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CFS GreenX Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CLEAR FLIGHT SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |