USPTO serial 87016306
HSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
86316 Friedberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Detweiler
Sean D. Detweiler Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.230 Third Avenue, 4th FloorCityPointWaltham, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery for metal, wood, plastic material and sand processing; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for the additive production of three dimensional moulds and cores for molding of three dimensional parts for industrial and commercial applications; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for the additive production of three dimensional parts by use of plastic material, metal, glass or sand particles for industrial and commercial applications; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for the additive production of three dimensional parts for Industrial and commercial applications; 3D-printing machinery; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for applying a number of layers for the production of three dimensional moulds and cores for molding of three dimensional parts; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for applying a number of layers for the production of three dimensional parts by use of plastic material, metal, ceramic or ceramic metal powder; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for the production of three dimensional parts by way of building the parts by way of a sequence of layer formation; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for the production of models for model building, in particular for sand casting mould forms, metal casting mould forms; industrial 3D printers in the nature of machinery for the production of models for model building, in particular for 3D-printing produced casting moulds made of plastic materials, metals, glass or sand | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer printers; data processing machinery and computers for computer aided design; software, namely, computer aided design software for use in additive manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | 3D-printing for third parties with regard to the production of three dimensional moulds and cores for molding of three dimensional parts for industrial and commercial applications; 3D-printing for third parties regarding making of three dimensional moulds and cores for molding of three dimensional parts for industrial and commercial applications; 3D- printing for third parties regarding making of three dimensional parts by use of particles of plastic materials, metals, glass or sand for industrial and commercial applications; 3D-printing for third parties regarding making of three dimensional parts for industrial and commercial applications; production services for third parties, in particular, custom manufacture of casting moulds for industrial and commercial applications; custom prototype fabrication of metal models and small series prototype fabrication of metal models for others; service work in the nature of consulting in the field of metal work processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological services, namely, scientific research and analysis in the field of 3D-printing materials; research and the development of technology related to the production and processing of sand casting mould forms and metal casting mould forms; design and engineering of computer hardware and computer software, in particular computer aided design software; design and counseling with regard to engineering of products and processes for third parties for the production of three dimensional parts by way of additive manufacturing; new product prototype design and development services for others; drafting of technical conception plans for others; technical consultation services related to the implementation of the product design and development process | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2016 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |