Drawing for CARDRONA

USPTO serial 87017137

CARDRONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDRONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter W. Peterson

PETER W. PETERSON DELIO, PETERSON & CURCIO, LLC700 STATE STREET, SUITE 402NEW HAVEN, CT 06511UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Building components predominantly of metal, namely, face plates for door and window handles, and door and window handles of common metal; window and door furniture and hardware, namely, metal window and door fittings; metal handles for doors and windowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2017FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance