Drawing for BRIDGESTONE INTELLIGENT OFFICE BIO

USPTO serial 87017476

BRIDGESTONE INTELLIGENT OFFICE BIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIDGESTONE INTELLIGENT OFFICE BIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY D. KRUGMAN

GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial robot; tire manufacturing machines; tire building machines; tire assembly machinesACTIVE—
009Measuring or testing machines and instruments, namely, machines for measuring length of member, machines for measuring joint amount; sensors for determining position, shearing deformation, non-metallic foreign substances, air inclusion between an inner liner and a carcass ply, air bubbles in tires, concavity and convexity, other than for medical use; non-destructive inspection apparatus, namely, X-ray and CT inspection devices for non-medical, non-destructive testing; electrical controlling devices; electric power control apparatus, namely, electrical controllers and power supply controllers; power distribution or control machines and apparatus, namely, electrical power distribution units; telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, telephones, fax machines and telecommunications transmitters; electronic machines and apparatus, namely, electronic control systems for machines, electronic apparatus and instruments for controlling, adjusting, and testing of drives, computers, computer peripherals, data processing devices; data processing apparatus; computer software for controlling industrial robots, tire manufacturing machines, tire building machines and tire assembly machinesACTIVE—
012TiresACTIVE—
042Cloud computing featuring software for use in industrial automation, machine diagnostics, and optimization of industrial performance; cloud computing featuring software for use in accessing, analyzing, processing and sharing quality informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 17, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance