USPTO serial 87018084
ARMÉR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARMÉR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pompano Beach, FL
Pompano Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Merry L. Biggerstaff
Merry L. Biggerstaff TIAJOLOFF & KELLY LLP405 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 37TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated organic based anti-bacterial and anti-fungal soaps and lotions to prevent skin infections caused by staphylococcus; non-medicated organic based anti-bacterial and anti-fungal soaps and lotions for ring worm, impetigo, herpes, and acne; body wash; body wipes; laundry detergent; facial bar soap; body bar soap; facial moisturizer; body moisturizer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 31, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |