Drawing for WM SYSTEM

USPTO serial 87018248

WM SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WM SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

aoi nawashiro

AOI NAWASHIRO BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC1625 K STREET, NW SUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal loading ramps for vehicles; metal loading platforms for land vehiclesACTIVE—
007Mechanical and pneumatic lifting and hoisting apparatus, and lifting devices, namely, mechanical and pneumatic lifts and elevators; mechanical apparatus and equipment for transporting loads; machines for dismantling and repairing lorry, van, car and tractor tires; parts and components therefor for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
012Motor vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, vans, sport utility vehicles and structural parts therefor; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, automobiles, airplanes, and boats; parts and components therefor for the aforesaid goods not included in other classes; TrailersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance