USPTO serial 87018922
SKIN SENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKIN SENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly Pekowsky,
HOLLY PEKOWSKY AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DISPOSABLE BABY DIAPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |