Drawing for FLAT OUT SEAMS

USPTO serial 87019588

FLAT OUT SEAMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAT OUT SEAMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HILLARY A BROOKS

HILLARY A BROOKS BROOKS QUINN LLC6513 132ND AVE NE, #378KIRKLAND, WA 98033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025(Based on Intent to Use) t-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, hooded tops, polo shirts, thermal shirts, fleece tops, athletic tops, knit tops, woven top, loungewear, baselayer, surfwear, pants, athletic bottoms, and sweatpants; (Based on 44(e)) underwear, sleepwear, swimwear, shorts, and leggingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 19, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 8, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 16, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 16, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 17, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 14, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 28, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 27, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 22, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance