Drawing for LUSTER WOLF

USPTO serial 87020136

LUSTER WOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUSTER WOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics; makeup; non-medicated skin care productsACTIVE—
005dietary supplements, nutritional supplements, medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 26, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2016CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance