Drawing for PARK SMARTER

USPTO serial 87020289

PARK SMARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARK SMARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine K. Au-Yeung

Christine K. Au-Yeung WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL ROADPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Parking meters and parking meter retrofit devices featuring electronic components for performing wireless telecommunications with a comprehensive web-based management server, electronic hardware components for accepting multiple payment options and photovoltaic cells to utilize solar-powerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 16, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 9, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 6, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 22, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 19, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance