USPTO serial 87020627
SENTRY BLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENTRY BLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Consultancy services in the field of home security; Consulting services in the field of counter-terrorism; Consulting services in the field of homeland security; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; Consulting services in the field of national security; Consulting services in the field of security intelligence; Consulting services in the field of security threat assessment; Military science services, namely, analyzing war strategies; Consultancy services in the field of home security; Consultation services concerning homeland safety and security issues; Consultation services concerning homeland safety and security issues; Consulting services in the field of homeland security; Consulting services in the field of counter-terrorism; Consulting services in the field of homeland security; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; Consulting services in the field of national security; Consulting services in the field of security intelligence; Consulting services in the field of security intelligence; Consulting services in the field of security threat assessment; Military science services, namely, analyzing war strategies; Monitoring of security systems; Monitoring of security systems; Providing advice in the field of public safety; Providing information in the field of public safety; Providing information in the field of the military, military tactics and strategies; Providing information in the field of the military, military tactics and strategies; Providing intelligence and information to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies relating to organized crime networks that operate across jurisdictional lines; Providing intelligence and information to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies relating to organized crime networks that operate across jurisdictional lines; Security consultancy; Security consultancy; Security services, namely, providing security assessments for businesses and governmental agencies; Security threat analysis for personal protection purposes; Security threat analysis for protecting personal property; Security threat analysis for protecting public safety | ACTIVE | Apr 29, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |