Drawing for DECOGUARD

USPTO serial 87020658

DECOGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DECOGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur Schaier

ARTHUR SCHAIER CARMODY TORRANCE SANDAK & HENNESSEY LLP195 CHURCH STREETNEW HAVEN, CT 06509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040plating and surface finishing services, namely, plating articles with copper, nickel and chromeACTIVE—
042engineering services in the field of industrial chemical use in metal and plastic finishing, plating, etching and surface finishing industries; scientific services, namely, scientific research, analysis and testing, regarding the use of industrial chemicals in metal and plastic finishing, plating, etching and surface finishingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 12, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 5, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance