USPTO serial 87021782
DEPARTMENT OF FLOORLAND SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2019
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with DEPARTMENT OF FLOORLAND SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
White Plains, NY
White Plains, NY
White Plains, NY
TARRYTOWN, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal R. Platt
Neal R. Platt Law Office of Jack M. Platt767 THIRD AVENUE24TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Door stops of metal; felt pads, coasters, anti-slip grippers, protective bumpers, and furniture leg tips, made predominantly of metal, for placement between furniture and floors, and for placement between hard surfaces and delicate surfaces with which they would otherwise come into direct contact, in order to reduce or prevent scratching and scuffing, and in order to reduce or prevent skidding and noise; and coasters and caster cups, made predominantly of metal, for placement between furniture and hard and carpeted floors with which they would otherwise come into direct contact, in order to prevent damage to furniture, floors, and carpet, and in order to reduce or prevent skidding and noise | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2019 |
| 017 | Door stops of rubber | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2019 |
| 020 | Door stops of plastic; door stops of wood; furniture casters, made predominantly of materials other than metal, for household, commercial and industrial use; felt pads, coasters, anti-slip grippers, protective bumpers, and furniture leg tips, made predominantly of materials other than metal, for placement between furniture and floors, and for placement between hard surfaces and delicate surfaces with which they would otherwise come into direct contact, in order to reduce or prevent scratching and scuffing, and in order to reduce or prevent skidding and noise; and coasters and caster cups, made predominantly of materials other than metal, for placement between furniture and hard and carpeted floors with which they would otherwise come into direct contact, in order to prevent damage to furniture, floors, and carpet, and in order to reduce or prevent skidding and noise | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Slider L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Slider L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Slider L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGIC SLIDERS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named DEPARTMENT OF FLOORLAND SECURITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |