Drawing for PROSTAR REACT

USPTO serial 87022083

PROSTAR REACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE-RICHARDSON HA, BRITTANY NICOLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROSTAR REACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberley Cunningham

Kimberley Cunningham Bennett Jones LLP3200 Telus House, 10020 -100 StreetEdmonton, Alberta, T5J0N3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer operating systems; computer operating programs; computer software for controlling the operation of drilling rigs and service rigs; computer software for remotely monitoring drilling rigs and service rigs; computer software for logging data from drilling rigs and service rigs; computer software for controlling mud pumps used with drilling rigs and manuals for instructing personnel how to install, operate, maintain and repair all of the foregoing and sold together as a unit with the identified softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 5, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance