Drawing for REALEYEZ

USPTO serial 87023257

REALEYEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REALEYEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. Ward

John F. Ward Bausch Health1400 N. Goodman StreetLaw DepartmentRochester, NY 14609

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for use in ophthalmic medical and surgical procedures, namely, for swept source optical coherence tomographyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 18, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 11, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 11, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 16, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 6, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 3, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 11, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 14, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 24, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 10, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 28, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 30, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance