USPTO serial 87023448
CONSTELLATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUNT, LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSTELLATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Alspaugh,
JOHN H. ALSPAUGH, SELTZER CAPLAN MCMAHON VITEK750 B STREET, SUITE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | traffic management equipment, namely, software to manage traffic; computer software and computer application software for collecting and processing data on vehicular accidents for use in the field of traffic incident and traffic management; computer software and computer application software for collecting and processing roadway traffic data and video information to detect and evaluate traffic conditions; computer software and computer application software for disseminating traffic and transportation data to others; computer software and computer application software for database management and data analysis for use in the field of traffic management; computer software and computer application software to automate data warehousing; computer software and computer application software for providing advance traveler information; computer software and computer application software for the use of real time messaging via Short Message Service (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), and push notification; computer software and computer application software for implementing control strategies that affect changes in transportation systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software to manage traffic; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for use in collecting and processing data on vehicular accidents for use in the field of traffic incident and traffic management; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for use in collecting and processing roadway traffic data and video information to detect and evaluate traffic conditions; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for use in disseminating traffic and transportation data to others; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for use in database management and data analysis for use in the field of traffic management; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software to automate data warehousing; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for use in providing advance traveler information; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for the use of real time messaging via Short Message Service (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), and push notification; software as a service (SAAS) services and cloud computing featuring software for use in implementing control strategies that affect changes in transportation systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONSTELLATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |