Drawing for FRANKIE

USPTO serial 87023589

FRANKIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FRANKIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessie K. Reider, CA Bar No. 2371113

JESSIE K. REIDER, CA BAR NO. 2371113 BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Bottoms; Dresses; Footwear; Jackets; TopsACTIVE
035On-line retail store services featuring clothing, headwear, footwear; Retail store services featuring clothing, headwear, footwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 12, 2018OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION
Oct 11, 2018IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
May 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 16, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 16, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 16, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 18, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 6, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance