Drawing for LUMINENT

USPTO serial 87024168

LUMINENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMINENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samuel Fifer

SAMUEL FIFER DENTONS US LLPPO BOX #061080 WACKER DRIVE STATIONCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in identifying, assessing, and managing risks for businessesACTIVE—
035Business risk assessment services; Business risk management consultationACTIVE—
036Financial risk assessment services; Financial risk management consultationACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in identifying, assessing, and managing risks for businessesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 21, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 24, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance