Drawing for TIPA-LOCK

USPTO serial 87027824

TIPA-LOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIPA-LOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Resnick

ADAM D. RESNICK MOSAIC LEGAL GROUP, PLLC5185 MACARTHUR BLVD., NW, SUITE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Food wrapping plastic film for household use; food wrapping plastic film; plastic film for use as wrapping and packaging material for general use; paper bio-based containers for food comprised of materials designed to lessen adverse effects on the environment; Biodegradable paper pulp-based materials, namely, bags, films and containers for packaging, wrapping, and storing food; trash bin and can disposable linersACTIVE—
020Industrial packaging containers of bio-based plastic; Panels of transparent plastics, being parts of plastic industrial packaging containersACTIVE—
021Household containers for foods; bottles, sold empty; biodegradable paper pulp-based cups, drinking vessels, containers for household use, serving trays, bowls, platesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance