USPTO serial 87027874
Serial No. 87027874
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 87027874?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lafayette, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip H. Gottfried
PHILIP H. GOTTFRIED AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUE21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh berries, namely, blueberries, blackberries, raspberries, haskap berries, currant berries, gooseberries and ground cherries; fresh stone fruit, namely, peaches, plums, cherries, nectarines and apricots; fresh pome fruit, namely, apples and pears; fresh vegetables, namely, broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, kale, radishes and turnips; fresh collard greens; fresh corn; fresh legumes, namely, peas, beans and lentils; fresh nightshade, namely, tomatoes, eggplant, goji berries, peppers and potatoes; fresh root vegetables, namely, beets, rutabaga and parsnip; fresh lettuce, namely, bibb, butterhead, romaine and cos; fresh lettuce mix, namely, mesclun mix, spicy greens mix and Asian mix; fresh arugula; fresh spinach; fresh mustard greens; fresh micro-greens, namely, beet greens, arugula micro-greens, amaranth, anise, basil, cilantro, dill, fennel, lemon balm, marigold, parsley, salad burnet, shiso, sorrel, carrots, chard, komatsuma, pac choi, scallions, shungiku, cress, mizuna and tatsoi; fresh liliaceae, namely, asparagus, garlic, onions and shallots; fresh Asian vegetables, namely, pak choi; fresh napa cabbage; young fresh soybeans in the pod (eda-mame); fresh okra; raw herbs, namely, chives, mint, coriander, sage, oregano and rosemary; fresh cucurbits, namely, cucumbers, zucchini, summer squash, winter squash, pumpkins, melons and gourds; fresh apiaceae, namely, caraway and celery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |