USPTO serial 87027984
SMARTER THAN YESTERDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTER THAN YESTERDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hoang-chi Truong
HOANG-CHI TRUONG PATENT LAW WORKS LLP310 East 4500 South, Suite 400SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones and for other handheld computing devices being computer tablets, namely, software for accessing online courses of instruction and training and for downloading and using educational videos; downloadable video recordings featuring instruction and training in the fields of software development, website design, CAD engineering, structural architecture and construction, 3D design, 3D printing, video game development, video effects for movies, television, video games, and other multi-media products, business software, business project management, entrepreneurial skills, business leadership and management skills, marketing and advertising artwork and content creation, animation, illustration, and delivery, database servers, data in computational forms, structured query language (SQL) systems, software languages, data analysis products, data analytical methods, and information technology operations and management | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing online and web-enabled courses of instruction and training at the professional and avocational levels in the fields of software development, website design, CAD engineering, structural architecture and construction, 3D design, 3D printing, video game development, video effects for movies, television, video games, and other multi-media products, business software, business project management, entrepreneurial skills, business leadership and management skills, marketing and advertising artwork and content creation, animation, illustration, and delivery, database servers, data in computational forms, structured query language (SQL) systems, software languages, data analysis products, data analytical methods, and information technology operations and management; education services, namely, providing educational assessments and vocational skills assessments in the fields of software development, website design, CAD engineering, structural architecture and construction, 3D design, 3D printing, video game development, video effects for movies, television, video games, and other multi-media products, business software, business project management, entrepreneurial skills, business leadership and management skills, marketing and advertising artwork and content creation, animation, illustration, and delivery, database servers, data in computational forms, structured query language (SQL) systems, software languages, data analysis products, data analytical methods, and information technology operations and management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |