USPTO serial 87028242
NIKOLA ZERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIKOLA ZERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. Edwards
TERRENCE J EDWARDS TECHLAW VENTURES PLLC3290 WEST MAYFLOWER WAYLEHI, UT 84043-3130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, side-by-sides, UTVs (Utility Task Vehicles), ROVs (Recreational Off-Highway Vehicles), MOHUVs (Multipurpose Off-Highway Utility Vehicles) and structural parts therefor; Automobiles; Structural parts for automobiles; Electric automobiles; Structural parts for electric automobiles; Land vehicles, namely, side-by-sides, UTVs (Utility Task Vehicles), ROVs (Recreational Off-Highway Vehicles), MOHUVs (Multipurpose Off-Highway Utility Vehicles); Motor vehicle body parts; Trim panels for motor vehicle bodies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |