USPTO serial 87029304
EUTROLOG FACTORY AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EUTROLOG FACTORY AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT ROADUTICA, OH 43080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial electric hammers; manipulators for forging presses and for forging machines; Casings for industrial machines; Machines for hoisting; lifting installations for the transport of persons and goods; hydraulic lift tables; Lifting apparatus in the nature of power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers, fork lifts, telehandlers, and lifts; Mobile platforms, namely, elevating or lifting work platforms; Stands for lifting machines; Automatic conveyor installations; Derricks; Machines for loading; Case loading machines; Automated machines for loading materials; Load carrying machines; Assembly line conveyor machinery; Industrial robots for use in the mounting of workpieces to be worked on; Robotic handling apparatus, namely, robotic arms for industrial purposes; Cargo handling machines; Modular machine tools for elevating and lifting work platforms; Truck cranes; Moving and handling equipment, namely, power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers, fork lifts, telehandlers, and lifts; Opening and closing mechanisms in the nature of electric door opening and closing system; machines in the nature of reciprocating feeders; Front end loaders; Envelope-inserting machines; Pallet transferring machines; Tray handling machines; Stacking machines other than fork-lift trucks; rollers conveyors being components of packaging line machines; industrial robots for feeding workpieces; industrial robots for transferring workpieces; powered metal loading ramps; Slitting machines for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric switchgears; electronic load indicators; Factory automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports; Integrated software packages for use in the automation of laboratories; computer programs for managing installations and machines used for moving and warehousing purposes; Software for managing installations and machines used for moving and warehousing purposes; Electronic circuits; Integrated electronic circuits; Calculators; Safety, security, protection and signalling devices, namely, electric sensors used to indicate the working of a machine; Robotic handling apparatus, namely, robotic arms for laboratory purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of industrial plant processes, namely, robots and machines for automating processes and moving goods; Installation of storage facility windows; Installation of electrical and generating machinery; Computer hardware and telecommunication apparatus installation, maintenance and repair; Installation, repair and maintenance of condensing apparatus; Installation of computer systems in the nature of hardware and peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research relating to the computerised automation of industrial processes; Research relating to the computerised automation of technical processes; Design and development of industrial machinery; Science and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, and testing in the field of robotics; Quality management services, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance and quality control in the field of robotic apparatus and automated machines; Technical verification of power systems designs; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of industrial process to assure compliance with the computer industry standards; Engineering design services; Industrial design services; IT consulting services; Engineering services; Conducting industrial tests; industrial process testing and industrial product testing; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of computer hardware; Research and development in the field of computer software; Research and consultancy services relating to computer hardware; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Installation, maintenance and repair of software for computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eutro Log S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Eutro Log S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EUTROLOG FACTORY AUTOMATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |