CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ET ENVISIONTEC MADE TO MATTER PROFESSIONAL GRADE 3D PRINTING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 87029592

ET ENVISIONTEC MADE TO MATTER PROFESSIONAL GRADE 3D PRINTING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ET ENVISIONTEC MADE TO MATTER PROFESSIONAL GRADE 3D PRINTING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Hansen

STEVEN R. HANSEN HANSEN IP LAW PLLCP.O. BOX 300069WATERFORD, MI 48330UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007computer-assisted machines for producing three-dimensional parts for further manufacture in the field of 3d printingACTIVE—
035cooperative advertising and marketing of rapid prototyping machines for othersACTIVE—
0403d printing of custom three-dimensional parts on a per-order basis with the aid of rapid prototyping machinesACTIVE—
042design and development of rapid prototyping machines and consultation services in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance