Drawing for WHITESTAR

USPTO serial 87029691

WHITESTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WHITESTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan M. Gelchinsky

JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY PIERCE ATWOOD LLP254 COMMERCIAL STREETPORTLAND, ME 04101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Products for the manufacture of alcoholic beverages, namely, finings to clarify beverages, clarifiers in the nature of chemicals to clarify alcoholic beverages, carbons, nutrients for use with yeast to assist fermentation, enzymes, glycerines, acidulants, salts, and cleaning and sterilizing chemicalsACTIVE—
030Yeast; products for the manufacture of alcoholic beverages, namely, almond and coconut extracts for use as a beverage flavoringACTIVE—
032Products for the manufacture of alcoholic beverages, namely, essences to provide flavoring, oak extracts to add flavorACTIVE—
033Products for the manufacture of alcoholic beverages, namely, alcoholic extractsACTIVE—
035Retail and online retail store services featuring products for the manufacture of alcoholic beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 4, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance