USPTO serial 87030413
INSTRUMENTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2020
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INSTRUMENTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PALO ALTO, CA, US
Palo Alto, CA, US
Palo Alto, CA, US
PALO ALTO, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hoang-chi Truong
Hoang-chi Truong PATENT LAW WORKS LLP4516 South 700 East, Suite 290SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84107United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for use in collecting, storing, viewing, sorting, manipulating, and analyzing data of the manufacturing process and the parts, components, or assemblies being manufactured; computer software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, predicting, and managing issues with equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; computer software to monitor, control, manage, improve, and optimize equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; computer software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track issues, and generate production reports; computer software for statistical analysis of data obtained from and the monitoring of process controls systems and production issues in manufacturing; computer software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, and managing manufacturing issues, namely, issues regarding process, workmanship, quality, and design; computer hardware, electric sensors, motion sensors, cameras, lights, radio transmitters and receivers, motion and light detectors, and robotic machinery, with all of the aforementioned being for use in connection with monitoring, controlling, managing, improving, and optimizing, the assembly line, test stations, and other processes in manufacturing; computer software for use in processing and managing part quality and product quality; computer software for use in extracting insights from bill of materials, supply chain, part quality, product quality, returns, recalls and repairs; computer software for use in comparing and analyzing idealized models of hardware to actual parts, components, and products; computer software for use comparing and predicting the performance of parts, process, and products | ACTIVE | May 5, 2016 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in collecting, storing, viewing, sorting, manipulating, and analyzing data of the manufacturing process and the parts, components, or assemblies being manufactured and for developing insights about the manufacturing process and the parts, components, or assemblies being manufactured; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, and managing issues with equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to monitor, control, manage, improve, and optimize equipment, processes, production, and products in manufacturing; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track issues, and generate production reports; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for statistical analysis of data obtained from and the monitoring of process controls systems and production issues in manufacturing; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identifying, diagnosing, analyzing, improving, optimizing, and managing manufacturing issues, namely, issues regarding process, workmanship, quality, and design; engineering services; engineering services in the field of manufacturing and the improvement and optimization of manufacturing production and processes; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in processing and managing part quality and product quality; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in extracting insights from bill of materials, supply chain, part quality, product quality, returns, recalls and repairs; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in comparing and analyzing idealized models of hardware to actual parts, components, and products; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use comparing and predicting the performance of parts, process, and products | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTRUMENTAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Mecha Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mecha Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INSTRUMENTAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INSTRUMENTAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |