Drawing for HOTWIRE TECHNOLOGY CENTER

USPTO serial 87030719

HOTWIRE TECHNOLOGY CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HOTWIRE TECHNOLOGY CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A. LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.1600 JFK BLVD.2ND FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Leasing of office space; Leasing of real estate; Real estate management of commercial real estate; Real estate management services; Leasing of office space; Real estate services, namely, rental, brokerage, leasing and management of commercial property, offices and office space; Rental of office spaceACTIVEJan 24, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 27, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 13, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance