Drawing for THE OPERATING SYSTEM FOR THE OFFICE

USPTO serial 87032572

THE OPERATING SYSTEM FOR THE OFFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE OPERATING SYSTEM FOR THE OFFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. McDonough

THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Procurement services, namely, purchasing of office supplies and food and beverages for others; Inventory management and stocking of office supplies excluding food and beverages; Providing office functions for others; Business services in the field of coordination of the delivery of office materials; Business administration of programs intended to lower health care costs and increase business productivity through employee health, wellness, and nutritional changesACTIVE—
037Cleaning of commercial premisesACTIVE—
039Office setup services, namely, moving furniture, seating, and office equipmentACTIVE—
043Stocking of food and beverages for offices, namely, provision of food and beverages for offices; Office event set up for others, namely, setting up rooms and spaces for business-related social eventsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 3, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 20, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance