USPTO serial 87032873
STARLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2017
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with STARLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Punjab, IN
Other trademarks owned by M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Punjab, IN
Other trademarks owned by M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Amritsar, IN
Other trademarks owned by M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M.C. Farrelly
Catherine M.C. Farrelly Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC28 Liberty StreetNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice [ ; Tapioca and sago; Flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, rice and dry mixes, specifically, bread mixes, mixes for bakery goods, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of rice; Bread, pastries; Edible ices; Sugar, honey, treacle; Yeast, baking-powder; Salt; Mustard; Vinegar, sauces; Spices; Ice ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by M/s Supple Tek Industries Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named STARLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |