CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RHYTHM BY KAMA SUTRA

USPTO serial 87035593

RHYTHM BY KAMA SUTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHYTHM BY KAMA SUTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irene Y. Lee

Irene Y. Lee Russ August & Kabat12424 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010CondomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 18, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 9, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 19, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 12, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance