Drawing for YOUR PLACE IN HISTORY

USPTO serial 87036020

YOUR PLACE IN HISTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOUR PLACE IN HISTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward E. Vassallo and Lisa Mottes

JESSICA HINEY AND LISA MOTTES FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019memorial plaques of stoneACTIVE—
025t-shirts; hats; visorsACTIVE—
040engraving; engraving, namely, engraving of genome codesACTIVE—
041memorial services in the nature of a museum composed of a sculptural maze comprised of walls engraved with personal, familial, genealogical and DNA information of the person to be memorializedACTIVE—
045maintaining records of genealogical informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2017CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 10, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Feb 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance