USPTO serial 87037882
UTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nanshan District, CN
Nanshan District, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; arranging and conducting trade shows in the fields of drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), and remote control (RC) aircraft; database management; electronic data processing services; marketing services; online advertising via a computer communications network; online retail store services provided via a global computer network featuring unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), drones, remote control (RC) aircraft, computer software, computer hardware, audio-visual equipment, toys, games, and electronic equipment and accessories therefor; online retail store services provided via a global computer network featuring the demonstration of drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and remote control (RC) aircraft; organization of exhibits for commercial or advertising purposes; personnel recruitment; demonstration of goods by electronic means for teleshopping services; production of advertising films; providing business information via a website; assistance in business management and product commercialization, within the framework of a franchise contract; assistance in franchised commercial business management; services rendered by a franchisor, namely, assistance in the running or management of commercial enterprises; retail store services featuring unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UAS), drones, remote control (RC) aircraft, computer software, computer hardware, audio-visual equipment, toys, games, and electronic equipment and accessories therefor; sales promotion services; shop window dressing; none of the foregoing in the fields of manned aircraft, aviation or aerospace | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |