Drawing for ACIMA, WHERE ORIGINAL COMES FROM

USPTO serial 87038945

ACIMA, WHERE ORIGINAL COMES FROM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACIMA, WHERE ORIGINAL COMES FROM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah E. Johnson

DEBORAH E. JOHNSON LAW OFFICE OF DEBORAH E JOHNSON, ESQ8913 Myranda CourtNORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76182UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Gin; Rum; Vodka; Alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; Bourbon whisky; Flavored tonic liquors; Liquor; Pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; Prepared alcoholic cocktail; TequilaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2018PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Oct 1, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2018ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2018PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 1, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 28, 2018PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2018TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 4, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2018PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 4, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2018ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2018PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 21, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 5, 2018PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2018TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2016CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance