USPTO serial 87039617
FRIJOLI CHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRIJOLI CHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel F. Pamias
SAMUEL F PAMIAS HOGLUND & PAMIAS PSC256 ELEANOR ROOSEVELT STSAN JUAN, PR 00918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Baking powder; bread; cakes; cocoa; coffee substitutes; flour; honey; ice; ice-cream; molasses syrup; mustard; pepper; rice; sago; salt; sauces; sugar; tapioca; tarts; tea; vinegar; yeast | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Productos Alimenticios Bocadeli, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Productos Alimenticios Bocadeli, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FRIJOLI CHIPS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |