Drawing for PIT POWER

USPTO serial 87039756

PIT POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIT POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039(Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Consulting services in the field of transportationACTIVE—
042(Based on 44(e)) Product development consultation in the field of fuel efficiency, rolling resistance, aerodynamics, powertrain and propulsion, green and environmental technologies in the field of transportation; testing, analysis, evaluation and ranking of fuel efficiency, rolling resistance, aerodynamics, powertrain and propulsion, green and environmental technologies to assure compliance with transportation industry standards; scientific consulting and research in the field of fuel consumption reduction and the commercialization of fuel and energy efficient technologies; new product development consultation for others in the field of vehicles and transportation; engineering in the field of traffic and transportation; engineering in the field of reduced fuel consumption vehicles; engineering services in the field of reducing vehicles fuel consumption; engineering services in the field of energy efficiency for vehicles; design and testing of new products for others in the field of energy efficient technologies for the transportation industry; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the products of others in the field of energy consumption reduction of vehicles to assure compliance with industry standards; research and development of technology in the field of fuel consumption reduction solutions for vehicles; (Based on Intent to Use) mechanical, electrical, computer, chemical engineering services for others in the field of energy efficient technologies for the transportation industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance