USPTO serial 87041207
ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, ELIZABETH S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. David Starr
H DAVID STARR MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Signal receivers, processors, and transmitters, namely, multi-carrier distributed antenna systems, head-ends, remote optic units, optical distribution units, optical expansion unit, low-power, mid-power and high-power remote optic units, add-on remote units; amplifiers for wireless communications; telecommunication base station interface units; DAS management system, namely, telecommunication hardware and software to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |