Drawing for FTX

USPTO serial 87041400

FTX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FTX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Kim

John M. Kim IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software and computer gaming software for gambling; computer game programs; video game software and video game software for gambling; video game programs; computer game software and computer game software for gambling purposes for use with gaming and gambling machines; computer game software and computer game software for gambling purposes for use with television sets; computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for playing video games and video game gamblingACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer and video games for gambling; provision of online non-downloadable computer game software and computer game software for gambling; provision of online non-downloadable video game software and video game software for gambling for use with gaming and gambling machines and with television sets connected to Internet; provision of online non-downloadable video game software and video game software for gambling for use on mobile devices, namely, cellular phonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 7, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 9, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 14, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 21, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 29, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance