USPTO serial 87043528
SPORTSMEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPORTSMEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alina S. Morris
ALINA S. MORRIS CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy-based food beverages; Non-dairy soy, flax, hemp, coconut, hazelnut, cashew, or almond based food beverages for use as milk substitutes; Soybean milk; Vegetable-based food beverages; Nut milk for use a milk substitute; Chocolate milk; Dairy-based chocolate food beverages; Broths; Poultry broths; Chili; Soups; Soy-based snack foods; Prepared beef, turkey and chicken; Beef; Turkey; Chicken; Meat; Dried meat; Jerky; Meat-based snack foods; Seafood, not live; Fish, not live; Salmon, not live; Tuna, not live; Frozen, shelf-stable, refrigerated, prepared, or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Oatmeal; Processed cereals; Sandwiches; Frozen breads with fillings consisting primarily of meat, poultry, fish, pizza, cheese, egg, or vegetables; Dough-enrobed foods with fillings consisting primarily of meat, poultry, fish, pizza, cheese, egg, or vegetables; Grain-based food beverages; Non-dairy rice, quinoa, oats, chia, sesame seeds, or barley based food beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Sports drinks; Energy drinks; Smoothies; Soft drinks; Coconut water; Drinking water; Drinking water fortified with minerals or vitamins; Non-dairy soy, flax, hemp, coconut, hazelnut, cashew, or almond based food beverages not for use as milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |