USPTO serial 87043768
OPRAH'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPRAH'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tamara Carmichael
TAMARA CARMICHAEL OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP1325 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Almond butter; Applesauce; Bacon; Beef; Berries preserved; Bouillon; Broth; Butter; Canned beans; Canned cooked meat; Canned fruits; Canned, cooked or otherwise processed tomatoes; Canola oil; Caviar; Cheese; Chicken; Chili; Chocolate milk; Coconut-based beverage used as a milk substitute; Coconut oil; Coffee creamers; Compotes; Condensed milk; Cooking oil; Corn oil; Cottage cheese; Crab cakes; Cranberry sauce; Cream, being dairy products; Cream cheese; Cut fruits; Cut vegetables; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based dips; Dried beans; Dried fruits; Dried vegetables; Eggs; Evaporated milk; Fish fillets; French fries; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Fruit leathers; Fruit salads; Fruit-based snack food; Garlic-based spread; Garden salads; Hummus; Jellies and jams; Meat; Milk; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Nut-based snack bars; Olive oil; Peanut butter; Pickles; Pork; Potato chips; Poultry, not live; Prepared nuts; Preserved fish; Preserved fruits; Preserved vegetables; Processed edible seeds; Processed fish; Processed olives; Processed vegetables; Raisins; Roasted nuts, namely, almonds, cashews, peanuts, pistachios, or mixed nuts; Salad oil; Salami; Salmon, not live; Sardines, not live; Sausages; Seafood, not live; Seed-based snack bars; Sesame oil; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit; Soup concentrates; Soup mixes; Soups; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Soy butter; Sunflower oil; Tinned fish; Tinned fruit; Tinned olives; Tinned vegetables; Tomato paste; Tomato puree; Tuna fish, not live; Vegetable-based meat substitutes; Vegetable salads; Whipped cream; Yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |