CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EFFICIENCY AS A SERVICE

USPTO serial 87043790

EFFICIENCY AS A SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFFICIENCY AS A SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George R. Schultz

GEORGE R SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES PC5400 LBJ FREEWAYSUITE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Equipment financing services, namely, financing of energy efficient lighting, hvac equipment, electronic controllers and installation thereof for othersACTIVE—
040Leasing services namely, providing energy efficient lighting, hvac equipment and electronic controllers on a paid as used basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 8, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 1, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 30, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 8, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 8, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2018NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2018TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 27, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 10, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2017OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2016LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Sep 6, 2016CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 3, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance