USPTO serial 87043865
POWERCLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2018
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with POWERCLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
Lisa M. DuRoss HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 200TROY, MI 48098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Cable feeding component of power-operated tools for use in cleaning and unblocking pipes, drains, sewers and tubes, and replacement parts therefor; ] power operated sewer and drain cleaning machines and replacement parts therefor; machines, namely, automatic cable feeders; [ electric pumps for use in testing pressure; cleaning and clearing water jetters, namely, water jets for removing materials from all types of drains and parts therefor; ] power-operated drain cleaning tools and parts and accessories therefor, namely, [ rods and rodders, closet augers, bulb augers, straight augers, funnel augers, drop head augers, retrieval type augers, chain knockers, ] cable carriers, [ adapters therefor, collets, clutch driver jaws, ] front end guide hoses, [ cable caddies, trap cutters, spear cutters, sawtooth cutters, spade cutters, H cutters, sharktooth cutters, three-blade type cutters, repair splicers, flexible leaders, transport wheels, telescoping manhole guide pipes, rod tools, spear heads, corkscrew cutters, double corkscrew cutters, pick-up tools, cutting tool adapters, pin keys, ] cable kits consisting primarily of replacement cables, cable carriers, [ collets, ] front end guide hoses, [ augers, cutters, and pin keys, grease guns, and specially fitted carrying cases for transporting the above; ] sewer and drain cleaning machines and attachments therefor, namely, [ sewer cleaning machine stands, augers, cutters, brushes, chain knockers, ] cables, cable connectors, hoses [ and nozzles; electric motors for power-operated tools and accessories therefor, namely, support stands; power operated rods and rodders; augers for use with rodder machines, namely, closet augers, bulb augers, hook augers, straight augers, funnel augers, drop head augers, retrieval type augers, chain knockers; cutters for use with sectional machines and rodder machines, namely, expanding finish cutters, grease cutters, trap cutters, spear cutters, sawtooth cutters, spade cutters, spiral cutters, H cutters, sharktooth cutters, multiple blade type cutters, spear head cutters, corkscrew augers; automatic cable feeders; clutch driver jaws as structural parts of machines ] ; power operated pipe cleaning machines and parts therefor, namely, couplers and couplings, flexible leaders, [ transport wheels, ] cable drums [ , drum handles, speed couplers for solid sewer rods and kits consisting primarily of the aforementioned goods; Handles, knobs and grips sold as an integral component of power tools; collets as component parts of, and replacement parts for, power tools for use in cleaning and unblocking pipes, drains, sewers, and tubes ] | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 30, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |