USPTO serial 87047162
EVERLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2017
- Examiner
- MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EVERLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
NEW TAIPEI CITY 23860, TW
EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
NEW TAIPEI CITY 23860, TW
EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
NEW TAIPEI CITY 23860, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simone Chen
Simone Chen MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. ROYAL STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR SEMICONDUCTORS, NAMELY, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; PHOTO TRANSISTORS; DISPLAYS, NAMELY, LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAYS, LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS; SIGNAL TRANSCEIVER; [ RECEIVERS FOR AUDIO, VIDEO, AND SATELLITE SIGNALS; TRANSMITTERS OF ELECTRONIC SIGNALS; BAR CODE READERS; CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY, AUDIO DECODERS AND VIDEO DECODERS; ] OPTICAL FIBER SIGNAL RECEIVER; INFRARED LED; LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES (LED); ENCODERS; LED DISPLAYS; OPTICAL SIGNAL TRANSMITTERS FOR LED LIGHTING PRODUCTS; ELECTRONIC DISPLAY INTERFACES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC SIGNBOARD DISPLAYS; PHOTOELECTRIC TUBES; OPTO ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, PHOTO COUPLERS; SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; OPTICAL FIBER CONNECTORS; OPTO ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, PHOTO INTERRUPTERS; ELECTRIC LIGHT DIMMERS, NAMELY, LIGHT DIMMING CONTROLLER; PHOTO-ELECTRIC SENSORS; PHOTO-ELECTRIC DETECTORS; INFRARED DETECTION APPARATUS, NAMELY, INFRARED THERMAL DETECTORS; ELECTRONIC TOUCH SENSITIVE SWITCHES; LIGHTING CONTROL APPARATUS, NOT FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH LOADING DOCK LIGHTING; ELECTRICITY SAVING ELEMENT, NAMELY, LOW POWER DIGITAL DISPLAYS, LEDS, SILICON DETECTORS, INFRA-RED RECEIVERS, OPTICAL SENSORS, PHOTO-COUPLERS, ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED NOT FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH LOADING DOCK LIGHTING; INFRARED DETECTORS; REMOTE CONTROLS FOR INFRARED DETECTORS; PHOTO-ELECTRIC SWITCHES; FLASH LAMPS FOR CAMERAS; [ LIGHTNING RODS; ] TRAFFIC LIGHTS; LIGHT CONTROL PANELS; ROTATING LIGHTS; VEHICLE-SIGNAL LIGHTS, NAMELY, VEHICLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS; EMERGENCY WARNING LIGHTS; HELMET SAFETY LIGHTS; LIGHT PENS | ACTIVE | May 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EVERLIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |