USPTO serial 87048368
CONNECTED DIABETES CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5542802Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2018
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONNECTED DIABETES CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan E. Anderson
RYAN E. ANDERSON LARSON & ANDERSON LLCPO BOX 4928DILLON, CO 80435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for mobile devices and computers, namely, software for use in obtaining, compiling, storing, editing, organizing, transmitting, and sharing of data and information; software for mobile devices and computers for managing patient medical information; software for connecting doctors, medical professionals, caregivers and patients and allowing for remote monitoring; all of the above-recited software being available for download from the internet, cloud, or fixed storage medium, namely, CD, USB Storage Drive, or disc; all of the foregoing software being for chronic disease management, diabetes management, population health management, and for facilitating communication and transfer of data and information among doctors, medical professionals, caregivers and patients and allowing for remote monitoring | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2017 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services in the fields of chronic disease management, diabetes management, population health management, and facilitating communication and transfer of data and information among doctors, medical professionals, caregivers and patients and allowing for remote monitoring; Providing temporary use of on-line nondownloadable software for chronic disease management, diabetes management, population health management, and facilitating communication and transfer of data and information among doctors, medical professionals, caregivers and patients and allowing for remote monitoring; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for chronic disease management, diabetes management, population health management, and for facilitating communication and transfer of data and information among doctors, medical professionals, caregivers and patients and allowing for remote monitoring | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |