Drawing for TUFF STUFF

USPTO serial 87048414

TUFF STUFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERTRAND, JOSEPH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUFF STUFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis H. Jaskoviak

Dennis H. Jaskoviak MAYBORN USA INC1010 WASHINGTON BLVD 11TH FLOORSTAMFORD, CT 06901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery not of precious metal; knives; forks; spoons; cutlery sets comprised of knives, forks, spoons, and hybrid forks and spoons; feeding utensils for babies and young children, namely, forks, spoons, knives, and hybrid forks and spoons; nail clippers; nail scissorsACTIVE—
021Cups; travel drinking cups sold with lids therefor; children's drinking cups with lids; stainless steel drinking cups with lids; valves of plastic, elastomers, or a combination of plastic and elastomers for metal drinking cups sold separately; insulated cups; cups of metal and plastic; mugs; flasks; vacuum flasks; insulated flasks and bottles sold empty; metal drinking bottles; metal plates, bowls and dishes; containers of metal for storing food for household use; lunch boxes; metal lunch boxes; stackable metal lunch boxes; tiffin sets of metal; metal dishes which can be warmed by adding hot water; metal lunch box sets, comprising lunch boxes, cups, plates, dishes and cutlery of metal; metal serving spoons; non-electric goods of food preparation, namely, blenders, grinders, whisks, sieves, mashers and gratersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2023EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 26, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2022FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Aug 5, 2022ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 29, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2022MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2022RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Feb 3, 2022APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 21, 2022ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Jan 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 1, 2021EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Nov 1, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 24, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 3, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 3, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 3, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 22, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance