Drawing for TRY-THRU

USPTO serial 87052320

TRY-THRU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WANG, WEN HSING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRY-THRU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles F. Meroni, Jr.

CHARLES F. MERONI, JR. MERONI & MERONI, P.C.P.O. BOX 309BARRINGTON, IL 60011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Drive through restaurant services featuring prepared foods made with ingredients available in grocery stores, which provide the public with the ability to try produce, meats, poultry, juices, dairy and specialty items in a lunch or dinner quantity and then be able to purchase the groceries in the store in a larger quantity which allows customers the ability to try out specialty foods in a fast manner before purchasing large quantities of groceries in the storeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 10, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 7, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 4, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance