Drawing for FREEDOM SHOWERS

USPTO serial 87052428

FREEDOM SHOWERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEDOM SHOWERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip Thomas Horton

PHILLIP THOMAS HORTON HORTON LAW PLLC736 WEST STATE ST F301FARMINGTON, UT 84025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ShowersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 3, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 3, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 15, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 15, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 23, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 31, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 31, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 31, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 29, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 23, 2018RMDTEXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB—
May 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 6, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 31, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 23, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance