Drawing for ITEMPRO

USPTO serial 87052585

ITEMPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITEMPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Faustino A. Lichauco

FAUSTINO A. LICHAUCO OCCHIUTI & ROHLICEK LLP321 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in the field of business organization and management consulting for logistics and supply chain management; Recorded software for use in the field of business organization and management consulting for logistics and supply chain management; Programs for use in the field of business organization and management consulting and stored on machine-readable data carriers for logistics and supply chain managementACTIVE—
038Providing user access to computer networks that enables them to use web-based computer programs for optimization of logistics and supply chain management; Providing access to databases for optimization of logistics and supply chain managementACTIVE—
042IT services, namely, development, programming, and implementation of software for optimization of logistics and supply chain management and software as a service for optimization of logistics and supply chain management; rental of software for computer project management, namely, for optimization of logistics and supply chain management; computer services, namely, ensuring correct operation of computers used for optimization of logistics and supply chain managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 15, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance