CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for QUBIT TV

USPTO serial 87052667

QUBIT TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUBIT TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Augusto Perera, Esq.

Augusto Perera, Esq. Albert Bordas, P.A.5975 Sunset Drive,Suite 705Miami, FL 33143

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring entertainment and educational content, namely, subscriptions to movies, series and television showsACTIVE—
038Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Streaming of audio and visual material via the internet; Video-ondemand transmission services; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Providing an on-line forum for where users can post ratings, reviews, and recommendations of movies and television shows and on events and activities in the field of entertainment and education; Video streaming services via the Internet, featuring independent films and moviesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance