Drawing for NERVANA

USPTO serial 87054852

NERVANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NERVANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy Peterson

Wendy Peterson Not Just Patents LLC1248 Victoria St NSt. Paul, MN 55117UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Stem cells for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 4, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance