USPTO serial 87056057
NEPHELE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEPHELE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul L. Havel
PAUL L. HAVEL MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP111 S.W. FIFTH AVENUESUITE 3400PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized database management in the fields of authentication, ecommerce, online payments, order queuing, website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scaling and messaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing an internet website portal in the field of online payment processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing access to databases in the fields of authentication, ecommerce, online payments, order queuing, website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scaling and messaging services; providing a website featuring information about an electronic messaging system, namely, electronic messaging queuing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application services provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing and maintaining applications, software, and websites in the fields of authentication, ecommerce, online payments, order queuing, website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scaling and messaging services; Application services provider, namely, providing virtual and non-virtual applications servers to others and computer software development in the fields of authentication, ecommerce, online payments, order queuing, website design, data storage, shared computing capacity scaling and messaging services; Application services provider, namely, providing a website featuring information in the fields of electronic document and email authentication services, design of ecommerce websites, website design, electronic data storage, shared computing capacity scaling; Application services provider, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hypersecu Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hypersecu Information Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEPHELE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |